2632-6779 (Print)
2633-6898 (Online)
Scopus
Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)
MLA International Bibliography
MLA Directory of Periodicals
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
British National Bibliography
WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings
EBSCO Education
ICI Journals Master List
ERIH PLUS
CNKI Scholar
Gale-Cengage
WorldCat
Crossref
Baidu Scholar
British Library
J-Gate
ROAD
BASE
Publons
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
ORE Directory
TIRF
China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation
Mihaela Tabak
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences in Zagreb, Croatia
Višnja Pavičić Takač
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek, Croatia
Abstract
Development of L2 learner's collocational competence is among the most complex aspects of language acquisition. It is strongly influenced by external factors such as instruction, L2 language proficiency, L1 influence, as well as the psychological-affective ones such as motivation and language learning strategies. Collocation learning strategies (CLS), a subcategory of vocabulary learning strategies, can be defined as mental and physical actions learners consciously use to assist them in the specific task of learning collocations. The overall aim of this study was to examine the relationship between collocational competence and CLS in an English for specific purposes (ESP) context. ESP collocations are multi-word expressions containing at least one specialised term which is usually the node of collocation. CLS frequency use was measured by the CLS Questionnaire (Tabak, 2022). The collocation knowledge test included the following three parts: 1) receptive knowledge test, i.e., a combination of a fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice task, modelled after the COLLMATCH format (Gyllstad, 2007), 2) test of receptive-productive knowledge of whole collocations adapted from the CONTRIX format (Revier, 2009), and 3) productive knowledge test, i.e., an L1-L2 translation task. Multiple regression analysis revealed that CLS are not a significant predictor of receptive collocation knowledge. CLS referring to learning collocations in context emerged as a positive predictor, and organisational CLS as a negative predictor of receptive-productive and productive collocation knowledge. Also, CLS referring to discovery of collocation meaning by guessing negatively correlated with the translation test scores. The results point to the importance of teaching and learning collocations in context.
Keywords
Collocation learning strategies, collocational competence, collocation testing, ESP