2632-6779 (Print)
2633-6898 (Online)


Scopus
Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)
MLA International Bibliography
MLA Directory of Periodicals
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
British National Bibliography
WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings
EBSCO Education
ICI Journals Master List
ERIH PLUS
CNKI Scholar
Gale-Cengage
WorldCat
Crossref
Baidu Scholar
British Library
J-Gate
ROAD
BASE
Publons
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
ORE Directory
TIRF
China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation
Chee Hye Lee
Hannam University, South Korea
En Hye Lee
Yong In University, South Korea
Abstract
Despite the growing uptake of Critical Content Analysis (CCA) in EFL education research, its methodological enactment remains insufficiently explicated. Many studies invoke CCA as an analytic framework yet offer limited transparency regarding the recursive, non-linear processes through which critical interpretations are developed. Addressing this methodological gap, this article clarifies the theoretical underpinnings and analytic procedures of CCA and proposes accessible yet theoretically flexible guidelines for conducting rigorous analysis in EFL research. The paper delineates the key phases of CCA and illustrates their implementation through examples drawn from EFL education. To render the analytic process visible, we reexamine two published EFL studies and unpack the recursive and iterative moves that shaped their analyses—processes that are rarely documented in CCA-based scholarship. The first exemplar demonstrates how recursive engagement with data and theory prompted the integration of additional theoretical perspectives following initial thematic patterns, leading to a re-interpretation of findings. The second study illustrates the iterative nature of thematic development, detailing how multiple cycles of categorization were negotiated before analytically robust patterns emerged. By foregrounding the methodological logic and recursive analytic practices of CCA in EFL contexts, this article contributes to greater procedural transparency and offers practical guidance for researchers committed to advocating more equitable and socially just English language education.
Keywords
Critical content analysis, methodology, education, English as a foreign language