2632-6779 (Print)
2633-6898 (Online)
Scopus
Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)
MLA International Bibliography
MLA Directory of Periodicals
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
British National Bibliography
WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings
EBSCO Education
ICI Journals Master List
ERIH PLUS
CNKI Scholar
Gale-Cengage
WorldCat
Crossref
Baidu Scholar
British Library
J-Gate
ROAD
BASE
Publons
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
ORE Directory
TIRF
China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation
Christian S. C. Chia
Jonathan Phan
Owen Harry
Kit-Mun Lee
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Abstract
Since its public release in November 2022, OpenAI’s ChatGPT has garnered significant global attention, although opinions on its use in education remain divided. Proponents highlight its potential to support diverse learning needs, and to function as a writing tool and writing assistant. Conversely, critics argue that over-reliance on AI could diminish critical thinking skills and increase instances of plagiarism. As a result, some higher education institutions worldwide have banned or restricted AI tools like ChatGPT due to concerns about plagiarism. However, since 2023, universities in Singapore have allowed students to use AI tools for their assignments provided they properly acknowledge the use of AI generated content. Despite the growing integration of AI in education, there is a lack of research focusing on graduate students’ use of AI tools for their assignments or projects. This study examines graduate students’ awareness, usage, opinions, and the impact of using ChatGPT as a learning tool. The questionnaire study consisted of 25 five-point Likert scale items and 8 four-point Likert scale items. The findings indicate that students were aware of ChatGPT’s capabilities and limitations, especially regarding the accuracy of information it generates. Generally, students had a positive opinion of ChatGPT, valuing its convenience and not perceiving its use as a violation of academic integrity. They recognised the benefits of using ChatGPT for grammar correction, paraphrasing, summarising texts, gathering information, generating content for research assignments, and data analysis.
Keywords
AI-assisted education, ChatGPT, academic writing and communication, graduate students, higher education