News

ISSN Number

2632-6779 (Print)  

2633-6898 (Online)

Abstracting/Indexing/Listing

Scopus

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)

MLA International Bibliography

MLA Directory of Periodicals

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)

QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)

British National Bibliography

WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings

EBSCO Education

ICI Journals Master List

ERIH PLUS

CNKI Scholar

Gale-Cengage

WorldCat

Crossref

Baidu Scholar

British Library

J-Gate

ROAD

BASE

Publons

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

ORE Directory

TIRF

China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation

 

Home Journal Index Online First

Chinese EFL Learners' Use of English Synonyms: A Mixed Methods Study

Download Full PDF

Hanzhong Sun

University of Cincinnati, USA

 

Shaohua Fang

Purdue University, USA

 

Hye Pae

University of Cincinnati, USA

 

Abstract

The appropriate use of synonyms enhances clarity and precision in writing and communication. This study investigates Chinese English-as-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ use of synonyms and factors influencing it, using an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach. Specifically, the study examines the extent to which Chinese EFL learners utilize syntactic and semantic information to distinguish between synonymous pairs, such as suggest and advise, and whether their L2 proficiency modulates their abilities to utilize these two cues. The study also explores factors influencing their use of synonyms through follow-up interviews. Two groups of EFL learners (n = 53) with differing L2 proficiency levels completed a forced-choice test, which also required brief written explanations for their lexical choices. The test included both syntactic and semantic items, with either syntactic or semantic cues available to aid them in making lexical choices. Results revealed that neither syntactic nor semantic knowledge was adequately mastered by learners. In within-subject comparisons, while low-proficiency learners performed comparably on both item types, the high-proficiency group performed better on semantic items than syntactic ones. In between-subject comparisons, the highproficiency group outperformed their lower-proficiency peers on semantic items, but not on syntactic ones. Interview data revealed influencing factors associated with item-specific, learner-centered, and learning-related properties. Pedagogical implications are discussed.

 

Keywords

Synonym, syntactic, semantic, Chinese EFL learners, proficiency level