2632-6779 (Print)
2633-6898 (Online)


Scopus
Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)
MLA International Bibliography
MLA Directory of Periodicals
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
British National Bibliography
WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings
EBSCO Education
ICI Journals Master List
ERIH PLUS
CNKI Scholar
Gale-Cengage
WorldCat
Crossref
Baidu Scholar
British Library
J-Gate
ROAD
BASE
Publons
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
ORE Directory
TIRF
China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation
Ken Hyland
University of East Anglia, UK
Abstract
This paper explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in feedback on second language (L2) writing, focusing on both Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) and emerging Generative AI (GenAI) tools. It examines AI-generated feedback across five dimensions: accuracy, relevance, empathy, learner engagement, and educational impact. The analysis shows that AI is effective in supporting surfacelevel features such as grammar, vocabulary, and clarity, and offers advantages in terms of immediacy and accessibility. However, it is less reliable in addressing deeper aspects of writing, including argumentation, disciplinary conventions, and audience awareness. Student perspectives suggest that AI feedback is valued for revision support but does not replace the depth and interaction of teacher feedback. The paper argues that AI is most effective when used in combination with teacher guidance, supporting both efficient feedback practices and meaningful learning.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, L2 writing, feedback, automated writing evaluation, generative AI, educational technology